That was her original plan, and I don't see why she would stray from it.Īnother thing that I would like to know (and what will now be speculated, I'm sure), is more information on the Weasleys. Also, to Applespider, I believe that Hermione would have gone to Australia and fetched her parents. However, you can still guess who is the headmaster of Hogwarts, what professions came out of Harry, Hermione, Ron, Ginny, and Luna, (Neville is the Herbology teacher), and what happened to the old professors. She did close of future speculation about them, in a way. I liked the Epilogue, as this was obviously what Rowling had in mind for her characters all along. Harry, the savior, "dying", "returning" to life, and getting rid of Voldemort (Satan) without using Avada Kedavra. Rowling said before that she couldn't reveal the specifics of her religion, because the plot tied in so closely with it. I'm sad it's over but glad it finished well. I thought that Rowling did a pretty good job of completing the saga with what were pretty high expectations from her readers. I'm sure the Harry Potter books will be read for many years to come by new generations of kids but it will never be quite the same since now we all know there's a happy ending. Those who read the first few Harry books have grown up and pitching it back to 11 year olds wouldn't have flown. I agree mostly but I don't think it could have been.
The only loose ends I can think of is whether Hermione did go back and collect her parents from Australia and lift the charm and whether Harry did become an Auror.Ī friend thought that the quotes at the beginning showed it wasn't a book for kids any longer. speculation and just wondering can be fun too. But part of me doesn't like all the ends completely tied off. Part of me thinks it was smart since now we know where Harry is in 19 years time, Rowling can avoid the urging to write book 8 to tell us what happens next. I suspect most of us thought that he might have to kill Voldemort or be killed (and Rowling played with the reader's mind on that one) He's survived all 7 books without killing anyone himself and proving that mercy is a worthwhile virtue. I was impressed that Rowling managed to keep Harry an unblemished hero.
the diary, the ring, the locket, the cup, the tiara and Harry (inadvertently) makes six so why was Nagini still one? Or was the idea that Nagini was number 6 and then the seventh part of Voldemort's soul split again into 7 (Harry) and 8 (himself)?
I'd thought that in Book 6, they said there were 6 Horcruxes and the seventh part of his soul was still with Voldemort's body? So. Got a little confused over the number of Horcruxes. and them switching from being the focus to not and back again. Wasn't entirely sure about the Hallows suddenly appearing as a plot device. I liked the way that some old threads from the past crept in and which, now we know the ending, going back to reread old books will show those clues - the locket in the cabinet at Grimmauld Place, the tiara in the room of requirement. I finished the book a few hours ago and have been mulling thoughts (hidden below) Others who have been around in a few books.Ĭrabbe (although I'd never thought he was supposed to be that great a magic to manage Fiendfyre)Ĭolin Creevey (who survived the Basilisk to die here)
0 kommentar(er)
